SOME COMMON AREAS OF MISUNDERSTANDING IN CRIMINAL LAW
I. When is an arresting police officer required to give the person arrested his or her Miranda warnings?
This is probably one of the most commonly misunderstood requirements. A police officer making an arrest is not required to give what is commonly known as Miranda warnings when making an arrest unless the police officer takes a statement either written or oral from the person being arrested. In other words, if a police officer simply arrests someone for a crime and does not attempt to take a statement from that person; the police officer does not have to give the Miranda warnings.
The purpose of the Miranda warnings is simply to advise persons being arrested that they have the following rights:
- That they do not have to give any statement whatsoever;
- That they have the right to an attorney;
- That if they cannot afford an attorney, the court will appoint one for them; and
- That anything they say can and will be used against them.
Additionally, even if a police officer intends to take a statement from a person, the police officer does not have to give Miranda warnings unless that person is in custody. Therefore, if a police officer simply happens upon the scene of a crime and begins questioning people about what had occurred, those people are not entitled to Miranda warnings unless they are placed in custody.
In the event that a police officer has arrested someone, and they are in custody, and he then takes a statement from that person without first giving the Miranda warnings, that person has a right to ask the court to keep out of the evidence which can be admitted to trial the statement that they gave to the police officer.
Please remember, there is absolutely no requirement for a person who is being arrested to give either an oral or a written statement to the police. A person has the absolute right to remain silent. The fact that you remain silent cannot later be used against you.
II. There is no right of a person arrested to make one phone call.
This is a television generated myth. Generally, out of courtesy, the police will permit people who have been arrested to make a phone call to either a family member or to their attorney.
III. If you are stopped for driving under the influence of alcohol and asked to submit to a chemical test of your blood to determine alcohol content, you do not have the right to consult with an attorney prior to making a decision as to whether or not to submit to the test.
Any delay on your part in unequivocally agreeing to take the test will be considered to be a refusal and you will lose your operator's license in the State of Pennsylvania for a period of one (1) year. The general rule is that it would be in your best interest to submit to a chemical test to determine your blood alcohol content when you are asked to do so by a police officer that has stopped you for driving under the influence of alcohol. Keep in mind there are always exceptions to this general rule. Remember, you do not have the right to select what type of test you will submit to. The arresting officer is the one who decides whether the test will be a blood test, a breath test or a urine test.
If you do not submit to a test when requested to by a police officer, and the police officer had cause to suspect that you were operating your vehicle under the influence of alcohol, you will lose your license for a period of one (1) year. If you should drive your automobile during that one year period of suspension, you will receive a mandatory jail sentence of 90 days, and a mandatory $1000.00 fine. Additionally, if you are subsequently found guilty of drunk driving, you will lose your license for an additional one (1) year for the drunk driving conviction.
IV. Always keep in mind that you never have to talk to a police officer or give consent to a police officer to search your person, your car or your home.
You should never interfere with a police officer who is conducting a search, but you have no obligation to consent to the search. If a police officer conducts a search and finds incriminating evidence, you will have the right to ask that the court not permit that evidence at the time of trial. However, if it was an illegal search but you consented to it, then that illegally obtained evidence will be admitted into court against you. It is the general rule that under no circumstances should you give a police officer consent to search your person, vehicle or home. Additionally, at no time should you make any statements to a police officer after being stopped, other than providing the police officer with the necessary information concerning your name, address, registration and license. At all times however, you should be polite and courteous with the arresting officer.
The firm of George & Joseph concentrates extensively in the area of criminal law defense. Our office handles the defense of all criminal charges. We have a multi-county practice and do significant defense work in the areas of drunk driving, robbery, drugs, rape and homicide, as well as all other criminal charges. Our office does not charge for an initial consultation. This firm is happy to be able to provide to Internet users commentaries on the criminal law. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call or write our office. We will endeavor to keep this information updated.